Legal case
dispute resolved by a court
Philippines v. China
Food and Nutrition Products v Neumann
National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents
Garfinkle v Estate Garfinkle
R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton CC
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
R v Grillo and Grillo
R v O'Grady
Hite v. Fairfax
Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Company of Texas v. Clay May
privacy in Australian law
Sue v Hill
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
Law v. Siegel
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Evans v. Michigan
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Mossman v. Higginson
Honda Motor Company v. Oberg
Moffat v Moffat
International Shipping v Bentley
Williamson v. Mazda
Joel Melamed and Hurwitz v Cleveland Estates
Kidwell v The Master
Wilson v. Girard
Le Riche v Hamman
LaRouche criminal trials
Lipschitz v Wolpert and Abrahams
M. C. Mehta v. Union of India
Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp.
Memory Institute SA v Hansen
Miller v Janks
Mistry v Interim National Medical and Dental Council of South Africa
Mokoena and Others v Administrator, Transvaal
National Commission for Scheduled Castes
MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.
R v Pritchard
R v Adams
R v Patel
R v Victor
Gregory v. Chicago
Hudson v. McMillian
S v B
S v Chretien
S v Fernandez
S v Jackson
Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders' Association
S v Russell
S v Williams